The Difference Between IP Address Leasing and Temporary Transfer
In internet resource management, there are several ways to obtain IP addresses. Among them, IP address leasing and temporary IP transfer are two common methods for acquiring IPs on a non-permanent basis. While both are temporary, they differ significantly in terms of ownership and operational requirements.
1. IP Address Leasing
Leasing is a flexible way to gain access to IP addresses. The user pays a monthly fee to use a block of IPs, but the ownership of these IPs remains with the original holder. The lessee is granted usage rights only, not ownership. One key advantage of leasing is that it does not require either party to be a Local Internet Registry (LIR) member under RIPE NCC. This makes it more accessible for individuals or non-LIR organizations.
2. Temporary IP Transfer
Temporary transfer is a method that grants near-full ownership rights over a defined period, typically one year. During this time, the recipient is treated almost as if they had received the IPs directly from RIPE. This allows full control for routing, registration, and management purposes. However, once the term expires, the IPs are automatically reclaimed and returned to their original status.
A major limitation of temporary transfer is that both parties must be LIR members under RIPE. While this adds a layer of formality and regulation, it also restricts who can participate in such transfers.
Summary
| Aspect | IP Leasing | Temporary Transfer |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Remains with the original holder | Temporarily transferred to recipient |
| Duration | Monthly basis | Typically one year |
| LIR Membership | Not required | Required for both parties |
| Usage Rights | Usage only | Nearly full ownership |
Both methods serve the purpose of temporarily acquiring IPs, and the right choice depends on the user's specific needs and qualifications.
